Runway Months
Live
Outcomes

Coverfox Founder Warns IRDAI Commission Cap Threatens Rural

Sanjib Jha of Coverfox has warned that IRDAI's proposed 2% commission cap on loan-linked insurance could make distribution to rural and low-income

Sanjib Jha of Coverfox has warned that IRDAI's proposed 2% commission cap on loan-linked insurance could make...

Sanjib Jha warns IRDAI's proposed commission cap on loan-linked insurance could undermine rural coverage. The founder and managing director of Coverfox argues a 2% remuneration limit for loan-linked protection products could make it uneconomic for lenders to continue distributing insurance to rural and low-income borrowers.

Jha detailed his objections in an open letter to the IRDAI chairman dated September 29. His sharpest criticism targets the proposed 2% commission limit for loan-linked protection. He argues this product, which reaches borrowers through lenders, is key for lower-income and rural households. Jha cites NABARD's NAFIS 2021-22 survey, which found 52% of rural households had outstanding debt compared to just 24% holding life insurance. He warns a 2% cap could dismantle the distribution infrastructure lenders have built over decades. Jha questioned who would enrol and service a rural borrower for ₹20, and at what quality. He also asked whether borrowers would remain covered if lenders stopped offering the product.

Historically, commissions on group credit life products have been around 30%, with some payments previously classified as marketing expenses.

Industry Impact

Jha and industry groups warn the proposed caps could trigger significant job losses. The Insurance Brokers Association of India (IBAI), which represents 798 licensed brokers, cautioned that the changes could weaken independent brokers and affect distribution in Tier II and III markets. Pune-based broker Quickinsure has already announced over 100 job cuts after discontinuing its field relationship-management model.

Its founder Anand Shrikhande said field-based models could become difficult to sustain under the proposed commission structure. Shrikhande estimated the wider industry could eventually see more than 1 lakh jobs affected if brokers reduce reliance on salaried sales teams. Jha warned of a similar effect on India's approximately 31 lakh individual agents and 27 lakh registered point-of-sale persons (POSPs), particularly those outside major cities. The industry has previously indicated nearly 1 crore agents may be needed to achieve the 'Insurance for All by 2047' goal. Jha has asked IRDAI how it plans to address potential job losses while seeking to expand the insurance distribution network.

The IBAI supports parts of the consultation paper, including a ban on forced bundling and greater transparency. Its main objection is to the proposed commission caps and a reduction in insurers' overall expense limits. The association argues caps below servicing costs could reduce the number of insurance sellers. It also disputed the consultation paper's commission data, saying it relies on outlying figures not representing industry averages.

Alternative Proposals

In his letter, Jha proposed alternative measures to expand coverage. He suggested a 'Priority Sector Insurance' framework, modelled on the RBI’s priority-sector lending, to target underserved customers. Jha favours regulating total expenses rather than individual commissions, paired with greater disclosure and audits. He also advocated for enabling established distributors to become insurers, subject to requirements, and using digital infrastructure to improve last-mile distribution. Jha called for detailed impact assessments and the formation of a standing advisory group with industry, consumer, and academic representatives.

Regulatory Context

IRDAI published the consultation paper 'Recalibrating Economics of Insurance Distribution' on September 23. It proposes product- and channel-specific commission ceilings and tighter expenses-of-management limits for insurers. The goal is to increase transparency, protect policyholders from mis-selling, and ensure distribution economics support wider coverage. Senior executives from life, general, and health insurers have met with IRDAI chairman Ajay Seth to seek a phased implementation and greater flexibility for certain products.

Ajay Seth defended the proposed reset, arguing that high upfront commissions contribute to mis-selling. He stated that savings from lower distribution costs should reach policyholders through lower premiums or better claims outcomes. The consultation on the IRDAI paper remains open until October 25, during which stakeholders including Jha, IBAI, and insurer executives are expected to submit formal responses.

Topics

#Outcomes

Related coverage

More from Outcomes